Popular Economics: What the Rolling Stones, Downton Abbey, and LeBron James Can Teach You about Economics

By John Tamny

Forbes editor John Tamny makes use of interesting tales from activities, videos, pop culture, and well-known companies to illustrate the elemental rules of economics. The Rolling Stones, the Dallas Cowboys, and Paris Hilton develop into examples of excellent and undesirable tax coverage. The Godfather, Gone With the Wind, and The Sopranos display the drawback of antitrust legislation, whereas the Michigan Wolverines’ 2007 loss to Appalachian country explains why rules usually fail to accomplish their meant goal. NBA big name LeBron James’ exploits at the basketball court docket illustrate unfastened alternate and comparative virtue, whereas the cooking of fowl wings makes the case for a solid dollar.

Popular Economics is an everyman’s consultant to how funds fairly works—a lesson politicians test (and fail) to understand each day.

Show description

Quick preview of Popular Economics: What the Rolling Stones, Downton Abbey, and LeBron James Can Teach You about Economics PDF

Similar Business books

Financial Shenanigans: How to Detect Accounting Gimmicks & Fraud in Financial Reports, 3rd Edition

From the “ Sherlock Holmes of Accounting,” the instruments you want to remain a step prior to the crooks “Howard Schilit is the authority on forensic accounting. monetary Shenanigans is helpful examining for industry members looking to determine misleading habit in corporation monetary statements. ” Julian Robertson, mythical investor and founder, Tiger administration “A must-read!

Crowdsourcing (The MIT Press Essential Knowledge series)

Ever because the time period "crowdsourcing" was once coined in 2006 by way of stressed out author Jeff Howe, staff actions starting from the production of the Oxford English Dictionary to the selecting of recent colours for M&Ms were categorised with this so much buzz-generating of media buzzwords. during this obtainable yet authoritative account, grounded within the empirical literature, Daren Brabham explains what crowdsourcing is, what it isn't, and the way it really works.

Breakthrough: Stories and Strategies of Radical Innovation (MIT Press)

Because the past due Nineties, expertise markets have declined dramatically. Responding to the altering company weather, businesses use suggestions of open innovation: buying applied sciences from outdoor, advertising their applied sciences to different businesses, and outsourcing production. yet open innovation isn't sufficient; it really is commonly the way to run a enterprise to its endgame.

101 Easy Ways to Make Your Home Sell Faster

A hundred and one effortless how one can Make your house promote swifter recommends a number of concepts to stress the powerful issues of a home and reduce its weaknesses.

Additional info for Popular Economics: What the Rolling Stones, Downton Abbey, and LeBron James Can Teach You about Economics

Show sample text content

Particularly, teams obvious as adversarial to important govt (and as a result to its feeding mechanism, the IRS) have been subjected to heightened scrutiny that amounted to harassment. every so often, IRS officers leaked exclusive information regarding disfavored teams to their political rivals. in accordance with this scandal, many have known as for the reform of the IRS, yet they omit the purpose. The IRS is politicized regardless of which get together is in strength. No reform will swap human nature. the genuine shame is that Americans—whose kingdom was once based on person freedom—cower prior to the political production that's the IRS each April 15. the genuine shame is a tax code that could be a monument to social engineering. The tax code rewards a few teams for being “non-profit,” a few for purchasing a home with debt, and others for having youngsters. The average reaction to the monstrosity that's our tax code is the flat tax that Steve Forbes has so articulately proposed. A flat tax might make the IRS mostly inappropriate and might remove the membership that we could fallible politicians let us know how you can dwell. A flat tax might abolish the myriad deductions that outline the tax method. it's going to get rid of taxes on capital earnings, companies, dividends, and estates—all of which quantity to quadruple taxation of people’ profits. the drawback to a flat tax is that it may well paintings too good. In a rustic choked with one of the most effective, entrepreneurial humans in the world, the stimulation of progress may raise the federal government’s already plentiful sales. All that extra cash within the treasury may well gas the government’s out of control development. Now, the government has an important position in maintaining voters from international intruders, administering justice, and retaining estate rights. It wishes profit, yet no longer approximately up to it gets. the simplest tax, for that reason, should be a tax on intake instead of income—what a few name the reasonable Tax. the 1st explanation for any such tax is that during a unfastened state, electorate would not have to turn out their source of revenue to the government. Adopting a intake tax and abolishing all different taxes and deductions may finish the IRS altogether. moment, even a flat source of revenue tax nonetheless places a value on paintings. a wise tax method could make paintings “free” whereas taxing intake. a few will recommend that this sort of tax might penalize outlets, yet humans produce so one can devour. The wishes of humans are limitless, so a mild tax on intake may have a negligible impression on intake. 3rd, no matter if a intake tax did have a obvious impression on spending, society will be at an advantage. to come to my chorus, there aren't any businesses, no start-ups, and no jobs with no discounts and funding first. If humans stay away from intake, their discount rates will offer the credits to the innovators of the following day. all of the items we take pleasure in this day are the results of previous discounts, and a small nationwide tax on intake might liberate huge, immense quantities of capital to fund the following Steve Jobs. Fourth, a intake tax will be blind.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.63 of 5 – based on 39 votes