The Ancient Quarrel Between Poetry and Philosophy (Princeton Legacy Library)

By Thomas Gould

Affecting audiences with depictions of anguish and injustice is a key functionality of tragedy, and but it has lengthy been seen by means of philosophers as a doubtful firm. during this publication Thomas Gould makes use of either old and theoretical methods to discover tragedy and its energy to gratify readers and audiences. he's taking as his place to begin Plato's ethical and mental objections to tragedy, and the clash he well-known among "poetry"--the exploitation of our craving to work out ourselves as victims--and "philosophy"--the insistence that each one strong everyone is chuffed. Plato's objections to tragedy are proven to be a vital function of Socratic rationalism and to represent an impressive problem even this present day. Gould makes a case for the rightness and mental necessity of violence and anguish in literature, artwork, and faith, yet he distinguishes among depictions of violence that elicit sympathy just for the sufferers and those who reason us to sympathize totally with the perpetrators. it's mainly the previous, Gould argues, that gas our responses not just to precise tragedy but additionally to spiritual myths and demanding screens of political rage.

Originally released in 1990.

The Princeton Legacy Library makes use of the newest print-on-demand expertise to back make to be had formerly out-of-print books from the celebrated backlist of Princeton college Press. those paperback versions protect the unique texts of those very important books whereas proposing them in sturdy paperback variants. The aim of the Princeton Legacy Library is to greatly raise entry to the wealthy scholarly history present in the millions of books released via Princeton college Press when you consider that its founding in 1905.

Show description

Preview of The Ancient Quarrel Between Poetry and Philosophy (Princeton Legacy Library) PDF

Similar Literary Studies books

Strategies for Reading and Arguing About Literature

For classes in English Composition, Argumentative Writing, and creation to Literature. techniques for interpreting and Arguing approximately Literature brings jointly the usually divergent reports of argumentation and literature.  This textbook teaches the paintings of educational argumentation via a spotlight on vintage and modern literature.

The Subject of Semiotics

This provocative booklet undertakes a brand new and demanding examining of contemporary semiotic and structuralist idea, arguing that motion pictures, novels, and poems can't be studied in isolation from their audience and readers.

Professing Literature: An Institutional History, Twentieth Anniversary Edition

Broadly thought of the traditional heritage of the occupation of literary stories, Professing Literature finds the long-forgotten rules and debates that created the literature division as we all know it this present day. In a readable and often-amusing narrative, Gerald Graff indicates that the heated conflicts of our fresh tradition wars echo—and usually recycle—controversies over how literature might be taught that begun greater than a century in the past.

No Country: Working-Class Writing in the Age of Globalization

Can there be a singular of the overseas operating category regardless of the stipulations and constraints of financial globalization? What does it suggest to invoke working-class writing as a moral intervention in an age of comparative virtue and outsourcing? No state argues for a rethinking of the style of working-class literature.

Additional info for The Ancient Quarrel Between Poetry and Philosophy (Princeton Legacy Library)

Show sample text content

Sophocles' attractiveness for orthodoxy and notable prefer from divinity, we may possibly suspect, derived from the luck with which he produced, by means of his dramatic pathe, emotional responses recognizable from well known piety, particularly the hero cults. purely within the Electra does he permit highbrow hesitation to complicate the reaction of the believers. Euripides constructs memorable dramas out of stark injustices, as Aristotle mentioned. He usually chooses sufferers whose radical innocence is straightforward to think. yet he usually allows wit and moment suggestions to complicate the solemn delight in the pious within the viewers. He occasionally we could the gods clarify their purposes for engineering the pathe of mortal heroes. so much in their speeches aren't calculated to delight the pious. The later culture in keeping with which Euripides and Socrates have been reliable associates isn't really inherently inconceivable. Euripides can have got down to undermine literal trust within the outdated holy tales, simply as Socrates was once doing. Armed with our new figuring out of pathos we' might be capable of shed new gentle on convinced notoriously ambiguous scenes within the surviving performs. Frag. 15 (Ross) of "On Philosophy. " See bankruptcy nine less than. XXlV advent we'll not be tempted to sum up Aeschylus's knowledge and his contribution to the talk via the formulation for reciprocal justice (to him who does it will likely be performed, pathein), which the avid gamers and dancers within the Oresteia occasionally take convenience in, occasionally locate ominous or miserable. Nor can we search for it in "illumination from a pathos" {pathei mathos), which used to be bound to males through Zeus, based on the dancers within the Agamemnon. First, the formulation may be obvious to intend no longer that we study from our personal affliction (a conventional mark of the fool),38 yet that the pious "learn" from the pathe of heroic figures like Iphigeneia. moment, the formulation isn't just the topic of agonized doubt at the a part of the previous males themselves; it's also rejected in prefer of a brand new, simply covenant on the finish of the trilogy. whilst the newly self-blinded Oedipus steps ahead in Sophocles' Oedipus the King, the dancers, just like the dancers within the Agamemnon, are by way of the truth that they don't locate the pathos basically revolting and frightening. The frisson because of the sight in their blind king has parts, repulsion and a longing to stare and to "learn. " however the ethical query is readily reduce brief. Oedipus insists that he needed to placed out his eyes; he had no selection. After these a long way better pathe engineered via Apollo himself, the parricide and the incest, what different direction may well he have taken (1329-35; cf. 1369-90)? The philosophers have been understandably by means of this latter scene. Plato identifies the play's plot as a complete because the so much surprising and lawless of the archetypical needs of the bottom a part of the psyche {Republic nine. 571 c 9). Aristotle, who frequently praises the play as an admirable manufacturer of pleasant detoxification of the best variety, however gadgets to this actual scene.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.31 of 5 – based on 5 votes